linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] fs/anon_inode: Introduce a new lib function anon_inode_getfile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51E5F03A.4060508@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:15:38 +0800
From:	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] fs/anon_inode: Introduce a new lib function
 anon_inode_getfile_private()

Hi Ben,

On 07/16/2013 09:16 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>
>> Introduce a new lib function anon_inode_getfile_private(), it creates a new file
>> instance by hooking it up to an anonymous inode, and a dentry that describe the
>> "class" of the file, similar to anon_inode_getfile(), but each file holds a
>> single inode. Furthermore, anyone who wants to create a private anon file will
>> benefit from this change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
> 
> Please don't add my Signed-off-by when I have never even seen or reviewed 
> a patch -- that is completely unacceptable.  

Sorry for my reckless action, I'll remember your reminder.:)

> Second, I don't think this 
> patch is suitable for 3.11, as it has not seen much testing outside of one 
> test program I had written.  It's a long standing bug, so it isn't urgent 
> to get the fix into the tree.  That said, it did pass a few tests I ran 
> last night, so it is probably suitable for the -next tree.

Thanks for your test.:)

Regards,
Gu

> 
> As for patch 1, it looks okay to me, but will need Al Viro's signoff.
> 
> 		-ben


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/