linux-kernel - Re: [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:24:05 +0200
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	kbuild-all@...org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email
 address: 'stable.]'

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:01:38AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:29 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> > > FYI, there are new warnings show up in
> > > tree:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes
> > > head:   71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5
> > > commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2
> > >
> > > scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch
> > >
> > > ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
> > > #41:
> > > cc: stable.]
> > 
> > Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash
> > maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc:
> > stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for
> > such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch
> > maintainer.
> > -Daniel
> 
> (It would have been nice to get the content that failes
>  instead of having to pull the tree)

Oops, sorry.

> Don't wrap text to start a line with cc:
> 
>     Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
>     Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
>     [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard
>     layout for the commit citation. Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a
>     cc: stable.]
>     Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org (Note: tiny conflict due to the addition of
> 
> You could have added something like:
> 
>     [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard
>              layout for the commit citation.
>              Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a cc: stable.]

Ok, I'll try to rewrap if the cc: hits the first row next time around -
just didn't occur to me that checkpatch would notice and I tend to not
re-run checkpatch before pushing when editing a patch a bit.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/