linux-kernel - Re: [v3.11-rc1 PATCH 0/5] printk: Initial restructuring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374026199.1949.62.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:56:39 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.11-rc1 PATCH 0/5] printk: Initial restructuring

On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 18:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > If this is acceptable, I'll post 5 or so patches at a time
> > after/if each block of patches is applied.
> 
> I didn't see anything objectionable, but I'm assuming this comes in
> through Andrew?

I'd rather you take it directly now.

> And hopefully gets comments from others too..

There were a few 9 months ago.

Mostly it was a timing issue as to who
takes it and when.

printk still moves around quite a bit
and Andrew suggested shortly after
an -rc1 was likely the best timing.

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1212.0/02931.html

As far as I'm concerned, the biggest
deal is starting this refactoring.

It doesn't have to be an big blast
like what was submitted last year,
but it should be started sooner
rather never.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/