[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130717154038.GK7656@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:40:39 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: rollback check for !dev->pins in
pinctrl_pm_select*() APIs
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> [130717 04:49]:
> The pinctrl support in Device core assumed to be optional - so, It's
> valid case, when there are no definition for default device's pinctrl
> states in DT at all ("default", "active", "idle", "sleep").
> And in this case dev->pins == NULL and pinctrl_pm_select*() API
> should return 0 always.
>
> Now the checks for !dev->pins have been removed from
> pinctrl_pm_select*() API mistakenly by the patch
> pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select_state functions
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg258829.html
>
> Hence, rollback these checks in in pinctrl_pm_select*() APIs.
Thanks, it's best that I fold this fix into my patch as it has not
been committed yet.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists