[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130717173720.GA31421@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:37:20 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] tracing/kprobes/uprobes: Fix race between
opening probe event files and deleting probe
On 07/17, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 15:38 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > Btw, Steven, what about other pending (and orthogonal changes) ?
> > > >From Jovi, from me. I see nothing new in linux-trace.git#for-next...
> >
> > My INBOX is full with too much crap. I thought I grabbed the patches
> > from you and Jovi, but they may have been something else.
> >
> > Can you just tell me what the subjects were. My INBOX currently has
> > >10,000 emails, and it's just getting worse.
Please see the attached mbox. It contains 2 series with
perf_trace_buf/perf_xxx hacks.
1-3 looks very simple and straightforward.
4-6 reimplement TP_perf_assign(), we already discussed this (and you even
did the performance testing), but I am still not sure if you agree with
this hack or not.
And 2 patches from Jovi, acked by Masami and me:
[PATCH 1/2 v6] tracing/uprobes: Support ftrace_event_file base multibuffer
[PATCH 2/2 v6] tracing/uprobes: Support soft-mode disabling
Oleg.
View attachment "RSND.m" of type "text/plain" (16629 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists