[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV86WdgN3+3FOSSTUvNJ6TgH4zbYkWOS7EPPHwO2Rf2TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:57:13 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Make sure IDT is page aligned
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:33 PM, tip-bot for Kees Cook <tipbot@...or.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 4df05f361937ee86e5a8c9ead8aeb6a19ea9b7d7
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4df05f361937ee86e5a8c9ead8aeb6a19ea9b7d7
> Author: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:41 -0700
> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
> CommitDate: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:14:48 -0700
>
> x86: Make sure IDT is page aligned
>
> Since the IDT is referenced from a fixmap, make sure it is page aligned.
> Merge with 32-bit one, since it was already aligned to deal with F00F
> bug. Since bss is cleared before IDT setup, it can live there. This also
> moves the other *_idt_table variables into common locations.
>
> This avoids the risk of the IDT ever being moved in the bss and having
> the mapping be offset, resulting in calling incorrect handlers. In the
> current upstream kernel this is not a manifested bug, but heavily patched
> kernels (such as those using the PaX patch series) did encounter this bug.
>
> The tables other than idt_table technically do not need to be page
> aligned, at least not at the current time, but using a common
> declaration avoids mistakes. On 64 bits the table is exactly one page
> long, anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130716183441.GA14232@www.outflux.net
> Reported-by: PaX Team <pageexec@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Hi, Peter,
Any reason for why following changelog get dropped?
---
v5:
- add comments to all IDTs about alignment reasoning, suggested by Linus
v4:
- rework using __page_aligned_bss, suggested by Yinghai LU
- move all the other IDT variables as well, suggested by HPA
v3:
- merge 32-bit and 64-bit idt_table definition
v2:
- 32-bit was already aligned
---
That at least would help us to check if you apply the right version.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists