linux-kernel - [PATCH 138/145] x86, efi: remove duplicate code in setup_arch() by using, efi_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:47:50 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 138/145] x86, efi: remove duplicate code in setup_arch() by using, efi_is_native()

3.8.13.5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>

commit 6b59e366e074d3962e04f01efb8acc10a33c0e1e upstream.

The check, "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) != efi_enabled(EFI_64BIT)",
in setup_arch() can be replaced by efi_is_enabled(). This change
remove duplicate code and improve readability.

Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
[ kamal: backport to 3.8 as prereq for "Modify UEFI anti-bricking code" ]
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h  | 9 ++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     | 3 +--
 arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 5 -----
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
index 28677c5..60c89f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
@@ -102,7 +102,14 @@ extern void efi_call_phys_epilog(void);
 extern void efi_unmap_memmap(void);
 extern void efi_memory_uc(u64 addr, unsigned long size);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_EFI
+#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
+
+static inline bool efi_is_native(void)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) == efi_enabled(EFI_64BIT);
+}
+
+#else
 /*
  * IF EFI is not configured, have the EFI calls return -ENOSYS.
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 8b24289..1abb796 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1135,8 +1135,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * mismatched firmware/kernel archtectures since there is no
 	 * support for runtime services.
 	 */
-	if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) &&
-	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) != efi_enabled(EFI_64BIT)) {
+	if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && !efi_is_native()) {
 		pr_info("efi: Setup done, disabling due to 32/64-bit mismatch\n");
 		efi_unmap_memmap();
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index ce51ed0..27ff3b0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ struct efi_memory_map memmap;
 static struct efi efi_phys __initdata;
 static efi_system_table_t efi_systab __initdata;
 
-static inline bool efi_is_native(void)
-{
-	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) == efi_enabled(EFI_64BIT);
-}
-
 unsigned long x86_efi_facility;
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/