[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1374101277-7915-112-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:47:23 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 111/145] svcrpc: don't error out on small tcp fragment
3.8.13.5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
commit 1f691b07c5dc51b2055834f58c0f351defd97f27 upstream.
Though clients we care about mostly don't do this, it is possible for
rpc requests to be sent in multiple fragments. Here we have a sanity
check to ensure that the final received rpc isn't too small--except that
the number we're actually checking is the length of just the final
fragment, not of the whole rpc. So a perfectly legal rpc that's
unluckily fragmented could cause the server to close the connection
here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index df74919..305374d 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
goto err_noclose;
}
- if (svc_sock_reclen(svsk) < 8) {
+ if (svsk->sk_datalen < 8) {
svsk->sk_datalen = 0;
goto err_delete; /* client is nuts. */
}
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists