[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130718070555.GC17622@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:05:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Make sure IDT is page aligned
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 11:57 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Peter,
> >
> > Any reason for why following changelog get dropped?
> >
> > ---
> > v5:
> > - add comments to all IDTs about alignment reasoning, suggested by Linus
> > v4:
> > - rework using __page_aligned_bss, suggested by Yinghai LU
> > - move all the other IDT variables as well, suggested by HPA
> > v3:
> > - merge 32-bit and 64-bit idt_table definition
> > v2:
> > - 32-bit was already aligned
> > ---
> >
> > That at least would help us to check if you apply the right version.
> >
>
> Procedurally, the changelogs don't belong in commit messages. I tend to
> leave them in if they are particularly illustrative or if the commit
> message only makes sense with the additional context, but neither of
> those is really ideal.
>
> Technically, because of the --- line which indicates the end of the
> commit message.
Furthermote, the -tip notification email will generally email-thread on
lkml to the patch submission that was applied.
That is a more robust indication of which submission was applied than any
changelog detail.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists