[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E7A63F.7020207@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:24:31 +0100
From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device
tree parsing for cpu nodes
On 17/07/13 15:43, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com wrote:
>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>>
>> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
>> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
>>
>> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
>>
>> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> index c233ea6..18aa3eb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> @@ -165,6 +166,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver kirkwood_cpufreq_driver = {
>> static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> + struct device *cpu_dev;
>> struct resource *res;
>> int err;
>>
>> @@ -175,9 +177,17 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (IS_ERR(priv.base))
>> return PTR_ERR(priv.base);
>>
>> - np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0");
>> - if (!np)
>> + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
>> + if (!cpu_dev) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get cpu device\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);
>> + if (!np) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get cpu device node\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>
> Hi Sudeep
>
> Are we not going a bit backwards here? You are replacing two lines
> with 10 lines.
>
> How about putting these 10 lines into some helper,
> of_get_cpu_device()? It would be useful for spear, kirkwood and
> imx6q, and maybe others.
>
Yes I realised that after making changes to this and pmac32 drivers. I
have already made those changes in v3. I am waiting for more response
before posting them.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists