[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130718092627.GG27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:26:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, eranian@...gle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Add Silvermont (22nm Atom) support
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:02:24PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> +static struct event_constraint intel_slm_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
> +{
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x013c, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
> + EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
> +};
I'm still missing the fixup for intel_pmu_init() that will make this
actually work -- and the comment to clarify that yes slm really does
count them the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists