[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307171747210.23502@eggly.anvils>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] thp, mm: locking tail page is a bug
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 02:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > lock_page() is a pretty commonly called function, and I assume quite a
> > lot of people run with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y.
> >
> > Is the overhead added by this patch really worthwhile?
>
> I always thought of it as a developer-only thing. I don't think any of
> the big distros turn it on by default.
That's how I think of it too (and the problem is often that too few mm
developers turn it on); but Dave Jones did confirm last November that
Fedora turns it on.
I believe Fedora turns it on to help us all, and wouldn't mind a mere
VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page)) in __lock_page() if it's helpful to Kirill.
But if VM_BUG_ONs become expensive, I do think it's for Fedora to
turn off CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, rather than for mm developers to avoid it.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists