linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] x86: avoid per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130718104711.GM27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:47:11 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] x86: avoid per_cpu for APIC id tables

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:45:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > While one could base the code (or even share) it with pipe, I'd like it 
> > to appear a different benchmark from the outside. Also I'm fairly sure 
> > they have a benchmark for this. Venki started this work, it looks like 
> > Andrew is taking over, good! :-)
> 
> Do you mean it should be in a separate 'perf bench sched remote-wakeup' 
> benchmark, appearing as a separate benchmark to the user? Agreed with 
> that.

Yes, exactly that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/