[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E749B3.40103@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:49:39 +0800
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-aio@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fs/aio: Add support to aio ring pages migration
Hi Ben,
On 07/17/2013 09:44 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 05:22:30PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>> As the aio job will pin the ring pages, that will lead to mem migrated
>> failed. In order to fix this problem we use an anon inode to manage the aio ring
>> pages, and setup the migratepage callback in the anon inode's address space, so
>> that when mem migrating the aio ring pages will be moved to other mem node safely.
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> Fix build failed issue if CONFIG_MIGRATION disabled.
>> Fix some minor issues under Benjamin's comments.
>
> I don't know what you did with this patch, but it doesn't apply to any of
> the trees I can find, and interdiff isn't able to compare it against your
> original patch. Since the first version of the patch was already applied
> it is generally more appropriate to provide an incremental fix. I've
> added the following to my tree (git://git.kvack.org/~bcrl/aio-next.git/)
> to fix the build issue. I've tested this with CONFIG_MIGRATION enabled
> and disabled on x86.
My patch is applied on 3.10 release. I'm sorry that my working department is
forbidden to access all the urls based on git protocol, so I can not make patch on
your aio_next. Does aio_next have trees based on http/https protocol?
Your fix looks very well.
IMHO, because we *extern* the migrate_page_move_mapping(), so we have
the duty to make sure it can work well all the place. If some one later use
migrate_page_move_mapping() with out the protection of CONFIG_MIGRATION,
it will lead to build-fail if CONFIG_MIGRATION is disable. So I think the
following change(return ENOSYS error is CONFIG_MIGRATION disabled) is still needed.
diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
index c407d88..3d0a486 100644
--- a/include/linux/migrate.h
+++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
@@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ static inline int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
+ struct buffer_head *head, enum migrate_mode mode)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
/* Possible settings for the migrate_page() method in address_operations */
#define migrate_page NULL
#define fail_migrate_page NULL
Best regards,
Gu
>
> -ben
View attachment "diff.patch" of type "text/plain" (611 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists