linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130718035026.8126.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Date:	17 Jul 2013 23:50:26 -0400
From:	"George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	linux@...izon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

> If you can point me to a single instance of Linus "abusing" someone
> who is not one of his trusted persons, who really should be able to
> deal with that, or someone who did not provoke him to go into rant
> mode, then I'm all on your side.

Well, the one that comes to mind is Alan Cox and the TTY driver in
2009.

And I still have to agree with his point about Linus's more absolute
pronouncements on user-space regressions: taken literally, they mean
that breaking rootkits is not okay.

Here's the thread if anyonw would like to judge "who started it":

http://marc.info/?t=124870111900001


That said, I strongly agree with this point:
> Linus simply has to trusts his top level maintainers, because he
> cannot review, audit and check 10k patches which flow into his tree
> every merge window himself.
>
> So if he finds out that someone who has his ultimate trust sends him a
> pile of crap, he tells that person in his own unmisunderstandable way
> that he's not amused.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/