[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130719052603.898094944@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:26:16 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jed Davis <jld@...illa.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: [ 59/72] ARM: 7765/1: perf: Record the user-mode PC in the call chain.
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jed Davis <jld@...illa.com>
commit c5f927a6f62196226915f12194c9d0df4e2210d7 upstream.
With this change, we no longer lose the innermost entry in the user-mode
part of the call chain. See also the x86 port, which includes the ip.
It's possible to partially work around this problem by post-processing
the data to use the PERF_SAMPLE_IP value, but this works only if the CPU
wasn't in the kernel when the sample was taken.
Signed-off-by: Jed Davis <jld@...illa.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchai
return;
}
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->ARM_pc);
tail = (struct frame_tail __user *)regs->ARM_fp - 1;
while ((entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists