linux-kernel - [ 02/72] CIFS: Fix a deadlock when a file is reopened

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130719052600.022992619@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:25:19 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@...ba.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: [ 02/72] CIFS: Fix a deadlock when a file is reopened

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@...ba.org>

commit 689c3db4d57a73bee6c5ad7797fce7b54d32a87c upstream.

If we request reading or writing on a file that needs to be
reopened, it causes the deadlock: we are already holding rw
semaphore for reading and then we try to acquire it for writing
in cifs_relock_file. Fix this by acquiring the semaphore for
reading in cifs_relock_file due to we don't make any changes in
locks and don't need a write access.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@...ba.org>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/cifs/file.c |    9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -553,11 +553,10 @@ cifs_relock_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cf
 	struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	/* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	down_read(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	if (cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
-		/* can cache locks - no need to push them */
-		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+		/* can cache locks - no need to relock */
+		up_read(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
 	}
 
@@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ cifs_relock_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cf
 	else
 		rc = tcon->ses->server->ops->push_mand_locks(cfile);
 
-	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	up_read(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	return rc;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/