[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130719071728.GX7656@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:17:29 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, balbi@...com,
Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
rnayak@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver
> On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
> Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for
> DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its
> not typical pin control functionality either but at least that framework
> is much closer to consider as an option.
>
> Actually its more of setting up the IRQ and DMA pins maps once
> at boot for a given SOC based on chosen configuration by the
> board. So I am leaning towards pinctrl as well. Just haven't
> thought enough about whether thats the best approach.
>
> CC'ing Linus W and Tony L whether we can use pinctrl framework
> for such an IP and if yes how ;-).
If it really muxes signals then using pinctrl seems logical.
Especially if the registers are in the SCM block.
It might be already possible to handle it already with
pinctrl-single,bits for the muxing part.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists