linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Few ignored framebuffer fixes/additions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:27:49 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	hector.palacios@...i.com,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas@...e-electrons.com>,
	plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Few ignored framebuffer fixes/additions

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:37:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:26:59 +0200 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry to bother you again with the framebuffer stuff but the new
> > maintainer doesn't appear to be responsive either.
> 
> Jean-Christophe is doing things - on 11 July he sent out a call for
> late patches to linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org.
> 
> So hopefully the resend of this patch series will be handled
> appropriately?

Hopefully. We'll see how it turns out then, and let you know.

Thanks,
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)