[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130719022404.116566509@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:24:33 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: [ 01/24] CIFS use sensible file nlink values if unprovided
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
commit 6658b9f70ebca5fc0795b1d6d733996af1e2caa7 upstream.
Certain servers may not set the NumberOfLinks field in query file/path
info responses. In such a case, cifs_inode_needs_reval() assumes that
all regular files are hardlinks and triggers revalidation, leading to
excessive and unnecessary network traffic.
This change hardcodes cf_nlink (and subsequently i_nlink) when not
returned by the server, similar to what already occurs in cifs_mkdir().
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cifs/inode.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -549,6 +549,11 @@ cifs_all_info_to_fattr(struct cifs_fattr
fattr->cf_mode &= ~(S_IWUGO);
fattr->cf_nlink = le32_to_cpu(info->NumberOfLinks);
+ if (fattr->cf_nlink < 1) {
+ cFYI(1, "replacing bogus file nlink value %u\n",
+ fattr->cf_nlink);
+ fattr->cf_nlink = 1;
+ }
}
fattr->cf_uid = cifs_sb->mnt_uid;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists