linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] extend hugepage migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374248976-te4ek4ys-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:49:36 -0400
From:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] extend hugepage migration

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:33:32PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:34:24PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > Here is the 3rd version of hugepage migration patchset.
> > I rebased it onto v3.11-rc1 and applied most of your feedbacks.
> > 
> > Some works referred to in previous discussion (shown below) are not included
> > in this patchset, but likely to be done after this work.
> >  - using page walker in check_range
> >  - split page table lock for pmd/pud based hugepage (maybe applicable to thp)
> 
> I did a quick read through the patchkit and it looks all good to me.
> It also closes a long standing gap. Thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

Thank you.
Can I add your Ack on the whole series?

> > Hugepage migration of 1GB hugepage is not enabled for now, because
> > I'm not sure whether users of 1GB hugepage really want it.
> > We need to spare free hugepage in order to do migration, but I don't
> > think that users want to 1GB memory to idle for that purpose
> > (currently we can't expand/shrink 1GB hugepage pool after boot).
> 
> I think we'll need 1GB migration sooner or later. As memory sizes
> go up 1GB use will be more common, and the limitation of not
> expanding/shrinking 1GB will be eventually fixed.
> 
> It would be just a straight forward extension of your patchkit,
> right?

Right, I'm preparing for 1GB hugepages migration, but it's still
lack of testing.

Thanks,
Naoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/