linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374250046.15242.7.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:07:26 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Alexandru Juncu <alexj@...edu.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	"andreas.dilger" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	"tao.peng" <tao.peng@....com>,
	driverdev <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code.

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 08:46 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Doesn't matter, if there are no users, please just remove it.

Is that, basically, your approach to staging cleanups?

I ask because I noticed that "drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/gss/"
is only built if CONFIG_PTLRPC_GSS is set. But the corresponding Kconfig
symbol is nowhere to be found.

Or do you prefer that I poke the people involved in (this case in)
Lustre before suggesting a drastic cleanup like that?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/