[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E98310.7020103@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:18:56 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
CC: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...com>, tony@...mide.com,
benoit.cousson@...aro.org, rnayak@...com, peter.ujfalusi@...com,
kishon@...com, jic23@....ac.uk, grant.likely@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, lars@...afoo.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
ch.naveen@...sung.com, poeschel@...onage.de, milo.kim@...com,
balajitk@...com, gg@...mlogic.co.uk, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: dts: twl: Add GPADC data to device tree
Hello.
On 07/19/2013 07:40 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> GPADC is the general purpose ADC present on twl6030.
>>> The dt data is interrupt used to trigger end of ADC
>>> conversion.
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> index 2e3bd31..d7d4c28 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi
>>> @@ -103,4 +103,10 @@
>>> compatible = "ti,twl6030-pwmled";
>>> #pwm-cells = <2>;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + adc: gpadc {
>> Read my lips: the node should be called just "adc", not "gpadc".
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Are you sure?
I didn't know how to express my disappointment from Oleksandr's inability
to understand what I wanted to convey to him from 2 attempts... first, he
changed the label instead of the node name, then he only dropped "twl6030_"
prefix from the name. I should probably have been even more specific before.
> Why? The name was selected according to the documentation on device "General
> purpose analog-to-digital converter (GPADC)".
Sigh, we simply don't care whether this ADC is general-purpose or not.
The main thing it is ADC.
> PS. Following your logic - "GPIO" need to renamed to "IO" everywhere ;P
GPIO is well known and established abbreviation, contrasted to GPADC.
Moreover, ePAPR spec lists "gpio" as a generic node name.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists