[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130719183101.GA20909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:31:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mutex: Fix mutex_can_spin_on_owner
mutex_can_spin_on_owner() is broken in that it would allow the compiler
to load lock->owner twice, seeing a pointer first time and a MULL
pointer the second time.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/mutex.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index ff05f4b..7ff48c5 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -209,11 +209,13 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
*/
static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ struct task_struct *owner;
int retval = 1;
rcu_read_lock();
- if (lock->owner)
- retval = lock->owner->on_cpu;
+ owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner);
+ if (owner)
+ retval = owner->on_cpu;
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists