linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] power: new trace event to print device suspend and resume time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:37:53 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	"len.brown@...el.com" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>, "rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] power: new trace event to print device suspend and
 resume time

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:29 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:

> Tried with temp variables. Patch is on its way with temp variables. I 
> generated .s with and without temp variables and didn't see any 
> difference. Should I be seeing a difference, if so what am I missing?
> 
> In any case, you have the patch v6 with temp variables.
> 

There may not be, matters how good gcc is in optimization.

Temp variables are fine to keep if they work.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/