| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1374259073.3356.22.camel@gandalf.local.home> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:37:53 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com> Cc: "len.brown@...el.com" <len.brown@...el.com>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>, "rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] power: new trace event to print device suspend and resume time On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:29 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > Tried with temp variables. Patch is on its way with temp variables. I > generated .s with and without temp variables and didn't see any > difference. Should I be seeing a difference, if so what am I missing? > > In any case, you have the patch v6 with temp variables. > There may not be, matters how good gcc is in optimization. Temp variables are fine to keep if they work. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists