[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130719200324.GA66975@intma.in>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:03:24 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@....org>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: mistakes in code vs. maintainer flow mistakes (was: [ 00/19]
3.10.1-stable review)
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>
> I'm not trying to shut down this discussion. But please, let's continue
> this discussion at KS, away from the court of public opinion. I would
> love for this email to serve as a final summary of my opinion. We can
> use this email to start a conversation at KS, and we can argue our
> hearts out there about the various points.
Well more than half your argument is about how "the court of public
opinion" regards interactions on the mailing list. Why is this
discussion exempt?
>
> Just please, let me do my job as a kernel maintainer, and please stop
> replying to this conversation. I can only write so many long emails a
> day without it cutting into my time for writing code and debugging USB
> issues.
>
You should have thought about that before you posted your assault on
free expression to every single social media outlet you have access to,
With any luck, next time, you will.
khm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists