linux-kernel - Re: mlockall triggred rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130719221538.GH21367@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:15:39 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...il.com, walken@...gle.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: mlockall triggred rcu_preempt stall.

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> My fuzz tester keeps hitting this. Every instance shows the non-irq stack
> came in from mlockall.  I'm only seeing this on one box, but that has more
> ram (8gb) than my other machines, which might explain it.

Are you building CONFIG_PREEMPT=n?  I don't see any preemption points in
do_mlockall(), so a range containing enough vmas might well stall the
CPU in that case.  

Does the patch below help?  If so, we probably need others, but let's
first see if this one helps.  ;-)

CCing the MM guys and those who have most recently touched do_mlockall()
for their insight as well.

							Thanx, Paul

> 	Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------

mm: Place preemption point in do_mlockall() loop

There is a loop in do_mlockall() that lacks a preemption point, which
means that the following can happen on non-preemptible builds of the
kernel:

> My fuzz tester keeps hitting this. Every instance shows the non-irq stack
> came in from mlockall.  I'm only seeing this on one box, but that has more
> ram (8gb) than my other machines, which might explain it.
>
> 	Dave
>
> INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU { 3}  (t=6500 jiffies g=470344 c=470343 q=0)
> sending NMI to all CPUs:
> NMI backtrace for cpu 3
> CPU: 3 PID: 29664 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.11.0-rc1+ #32
> task: ffff88023e743fc0 ti: ffff88022f6f2000 task.ti: ffff88022f6f2000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810bf7d1>]  [<ffffffff810bf7d1>] trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x21/0xb0
> RSP: 0018:ffff880244e03c30  EFLAGS: 00000046
> RAX: ffff88023e743fc0 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 000000000000003c
> RDX: 000000000000000f RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff81033cab
> RBP: ffff880244e03c38 R08: ffff880243288a80 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff880243288a80
> R13: ffff8802437eda40 R14: 0000000000080000 R15: 000000000000d010
> FS:  00007f50ae33b740(0000) GS:ffff880244e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000000000097f000 CR3: 0000000240fa0000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
> Stack:
>  ffffffff810bf86d ffff880244e03c98 ffffffff81033cab 0000000000000096
>  000000000000d008 0000000300000002 0000000000000004 0000000000000003
>  0000000000002710 ffffffff81c50d00 ffffffff81c50d00 ffff880244fcde00
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ>
>  [<ffffffff810bf86d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
>  [<ffffffff81033cab>] __x2apic_send_IPI_mask+0x1ab/0x1c0
>  [<ffffffff81033cdc>] x2apic_send_IPI_all+0x1c/0x20
>  [<ffffffff81030115>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x65/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff811144b1>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x331/0x8e0
>  [<ffffffff8108bfa0>] ? hrtimer_run_queues+0x20/0x180
>  [<ffffffff8109e905>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb5/0x100
>  [<ffffffff81069557>] update_process_times+0x47/0x80
>  [<ffffffff810bd115>] tick_sched_handle.isra.16+0x25/0x60
>  [<ffffffff810bd231>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60
>  [<ffffffff8108ace1>] __run_hrtimer+0x81/0x4e0
>  [<ffffffff810bd1f0>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60
>  [<ffffffff8108b93f>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xff/0x240
>  [<ffffffff8102de84>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x34/0x60
>  [<ffffffff81718c5f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x60
>  [<ffffffff817178ef>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
>  [<ffffffff8170e8e0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
>  [<ffffffff8105f101>] ? __do_softirq+0xb1/0x440
>  [<ffffffff8105f64d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0
>  [<ffffffff81718c65>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60
>  [<ffffffff817178ef>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
>  <EOI>
>  [<ffffffff8170e8e0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
>  [<ffffffff8170b830>] ? wait_for_completion_killable+0x170/0x170
>  [<ffffffff8170c853>] ? preempt_schedule_irq+0x53/0x90
>  [<ffffffff8170e9f6>] retint_kernel+0x26/0x30
>  [<ffffffff8107a523>] ? queue_work_on+0x43/0x90
>  [<ffffffff8107c369>] schedule_on_each_cpu+0xc9/0x1a0
>  [<ffffffff81167770>] ? lru_add_drain+0x50/0x50
>  [<ffffffff811677c5>] lru_add_drain_all+0x15/0x20
>  [<ffffffff81186965>] SyS_mlockall+0xa5/0x1a0
>  [<ffffffff81716e94>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

This commit addresses this problem by inserting the required preemption
point.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index 79b7cf7..92022eb 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ static int do_mlockall(int flags)
 
 		/* Ignore errors */
 		mlock_fixup(vma, &prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, newflags);
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 out:
 	return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/