[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130719161616.b3805734beb57a657a122e25@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:16:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmstats: track TLB flush stats on UP too
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:40:04 -0700 Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
>
> Andrew, this fixes up the TLB flush vmstats for UP. It's on top
> of the previous patch, but I'm happy to combine them and send a
> replacement if you'd prefer.
>
> This also removes the NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ONE_KERNEL counter. We
> do not have a good API on UP to separate out the kernel from the
> non-kernel flushes. It's probably not an important distinction
> anyway.
>
> Compile and boot tested on 64-bit SMP and UP. Compile tested
> for x86_32 SMP.
>
> --
>
> The previous patch doing vmstats for TLB flushes effectively
> missed UP since arch/x86/mm/tlb.c is only compiled for SMP.
>
> UP systems do not do remote TLB flushes, so compile those
> counters out on UP.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c calls __flush_tlb() directly.
> This is probably an optimization since both the mtrr code and
> __flush_tlb() write cr4. It would probably be safe to make that
> a flush_tlb_all() (and then get these statistics), but the mtrr
> code is ancient and I'm hesitant to touch it other than to just
> stick in the counters.
Do we really want to do this? I agree that UP isn't super-important,
particularly on x86, and the benefit here is small.
Often I mention things just to check that they have been considered.
Considered-and-rejected is better than forgot-about-that.
> ...
>
> --- linux.git/include/linux/vm_event_item.h~compile-useless-stats-out-on-up 2013-07-19 08:21:37.408237538 -0700
> +++ linux.git-davehans/include/linux/vm_event_item.h 2013-07-19 09:13:16.903143205 -0700
> @@ -70,11 +70,12 @@ enum vm_event_item { PGPGIN, PGPGOUT, PS
> THP_ZERO_PAGE_ALLOC,
> THP_ZERO_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED,
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH, /* cpu tried to flush others' tlbs */
> NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED,/* cpu received ipi for flush */
> +#endif
> NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ALL,
> NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ONE,
> - NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ONE_KERNEL,
> NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS
I was all excited, expecting documentation for these as discussed
yesterday, but it was not to be :(
> +/* "_up" is for UniProcessor
> + *
> + * This is a helper for other header functions. *Not*
> + * intended to be called directly. All global TLB
> + * flushes need to either call this, or do the bump the
> + * vm statistics themselves.
> + */
Comment seems a bit sickly. Have a pill:
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h~mm-vmstats-track-tlb-flush-stats-on-up-too-fix
+++ a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -85,11 +85,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_one(unsig
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
-/* "_up" is for UniProcessor
+/* "_up" is for UniProcessor.
*
- * This is a helper for other header functions. *Not*
- * intended to be called directly. All global TLB
- * flushes need to either call this, or do the bump the
+ * This is a helper for other header functions. *Not* intended to be called
+ * directly. All global TLB flushes need to either call this, or to bump the
* vm statistics themselves.
*/
static inline void __flush_tlb_up(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists