linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/24] 3.4.54-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <B8EFE96D1287C24090BAD9D858E15E61746937@sisaex01sj>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:19:34 +0000
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/24] 3.4.54-stable review

On 07/19/2013 05:17 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.54 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 02:23:13 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.54-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>


Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.86, 3.4.54, 3.9.10, and 3.10.1

3.9.11-rc1 patch failed to build:
x64-64, mipsel, mips, powerpc, and tile: build failed with the following 
error:

    LD      ipc/built-in.o
    CC [M]  fs/cifs/inode.o
fs/cifs/inode.c: In function ‘cifs_all_info_to_fattr’:
fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function
‘cifs_dbg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    CC      security/selinux/hooks.o

I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled.
cifs_dbg() is not defined.

Compiled and booted on the following systems:

Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
     (3.4.54-rc1, 3.9.10-rc1, 3.10.2-rc2)
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
     (3.0.87-rc1, 3.4.54-rc1, 3.9.10-rc1?, and 3.10.2-rc2)

dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the 
previous dmesgs for each of these releases. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, 
err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Cross-compile testing:
HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2:
     (3.0.87-rc1, 3.4.54-rc1, 3.9.10-rc1?, and 3.10.2-rc2)

Cross-compile tests results:

alpha: defconfig passed on all
arm: defconfig passed on all
arm64: not applicable to 3.0.y, 3.4.y. defconfig passed on 3.9.y, and 3.10.y
c6x: not applicable to 3.0.y, defconfig passed on 3.4.y, 3.9.y, and 3.10.y
mips: defconfig passed on all, except 3.9.10
mipsel: defconfig passed on all, except 3.9.10
powerpc: wii_defconfig passed on all, except 3.9.10
sh: defconfig passed on all
sparc: defconfig passed on all
tile: tilegx_defconfig passed on all, except 3.9.10

-- Shuah

Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research 
America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/