[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374277033.22432.384.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:37:13 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
ak <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module
dependency.
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 09:24 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:21:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > The issue here seems to be the dynamic binding nature of the crypto
> > subsystem. When something needs crypto, it will request the appropriate
> > crypto module (e.g. crct10dif), which may race with detecting a specific
> > hardware accelerator based on CPUID or device information (e.g.
> > crct10dif_pclmul).
> >
> > RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just "solved" it by
> > compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module.
>
> I think for crypto the simplest solution is to not do CPUID-based
> loading. Then crypto users will simply load the module alias which
> causes modprobe to load all modules providing that alias.
>
> Cheers,
Herbert,
I've tried the module alias approach (see my earlier mail with patch)
but it didn't seem to load things properly. Can you check to see if
there's anything I did incorrectly.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists