[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130720054439.308B33E13F0@localhost>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:44:39 +0100
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: match the compatible in the order set by the dts file
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:10:53 +0800, Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com> wrote:
> 于 2013年07月09日 15:51, Sascha Hauer 写道:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:46:34PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> >> 于 2013年07月09日 15:05, Sascha Hauer 写道:
> >>> Why don't you set the matching order in the driver the way you want it
> >>> to be, i.e.:
> >>>
> >>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-uart", ... },
> >>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", ... },
> >>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-uart", ... },
> >>>
> >> yes. i can set it like this.
> >>
> >> but this method looks like a ugly workaround.
> > If a driver has different ways of supporting a single device, then
> > putting the preferred or most feature rich on top doesn't look very ugly
> > to me.
> this method makes it much _coupled_ between the driver and the dts file.
>
> IMHO, it's an unnecessary _burden_ to the driver programmer:
> he should puts the most feature compatible on the top.
>
> it's much graceful if we let the driver programmer be transparent about
> this.
Absolutely true. Applied, thanks.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists