linux-kernel - Re: New device tree mailing list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130720205017.GC1877@marklar.spinoli.org>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:50:17 -0400
From:	Hank Leininger <hlein@...c.info>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: New device tree mailing list

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:18:54PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Hank Leininger <hlein@...c.info> wrote:
> >
> > I realize MARC didn't carry the old/original devicetree-discuss list at
> > ozlabs.  I'm pulling down the archives from that list now.  Should I
> > import them as 'devicetree-discuss' (historically accurate) or as
> > 'devicetree' (so they will appear seamless in MARC w/the new vger list's
> > traffic)?
> 
> As long as it doesn't cause any problems with duplicate messages for
> the next short little while, I would merge the two archives.

Sold!  Importing them now as 'devicetree'.  Because I grabbed them at
the same time as I subscribed to the new list, there shouldn't be any
overlap/duplicates.

Thanks,

Hank

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (448 bytes)