linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 20 Jul 2013 00:10:02 +0000
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review

On 07/19/2013 05:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:25:24PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> ---------------
>>>> Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing.
>>>> Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible.
>>>> ---------------
>>>>
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release.
>>>> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>>
>>>
>>> Greg,
>>>
>>> Build failed with the following error:
>>>
>>>     LD      ipc/built-in.o
>>>     CC [M]  fs/cifs/inode.o
>>> fs/cifs/inode.c: In function ‘cifs_all_info_to_fattr’:
>>> fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function
>>> ‘cifs_dbg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>> make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1
>>> make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2
>>> make: *** [fs] Error 2
>>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>     CC      security/selinux/hooks.o
>>>
>>> I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled.
>>> cifs_dbg() is not defined.
>>
>> Ugh, I thought I fixed that one...  I did it for the 3.4 and other
>> trees, I'll go see what I did wrong...
>
> Ok, I've now fixed this, I don't know how it got through my tests, when
> I tried it again, it failed.  Before it wasn't, odd...
>
> Anyway, there is a new -rc2 kernel patch at:
>   	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc2.gz
>
> If you could test that out, I would appreciate it, to ensure I didn't do
> anything stupid with this one too.
>
> Ick, handling 4 kernels at once really takes its toll on me, this was
> not a good review cycle...
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Greg,

rc2 compiled on x86-64. I will run cross-compile tests and boot tests 
later on today or tomorrow morning and report the results.

-- Shuah

Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research 
America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/