[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1EC23D2B9975384993D85B5DB93AAE8861AA4D@sisaex01sj>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:35:33 +0000
From: Daniel Phillips <d.phillips@...tner.samsung.com>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] Maybe it's time to shut this thread down
(Was: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)
On 07/18/2013 03:54 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Let's shift this discussion away from the terms "abuse" and
> "professionalism" to "respect" and "civility".
Brilliant, and +1 for a session at KS. In the mean time, why don't we
all try to demonstrate the real meaning of respect and civility, by
practising it henceforth on LKML? KS ought to be about clarification,
reinforcement and specific techniques, as opposed to the question of
whether respect and civility are desirable in the first place. Nobody
needs to wait for KS to learn the basic truth they already know in their
heart.
Regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists