[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAG0J9-OgVe3Y0uo0bKr2TTcn3YUna1C_5NixBSsft3+cbKKWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:08:40 +0100
From: James Hogan <james@...anarts.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.11-rc2
On 21 July 2013 20:53, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> (b) we had a late change to how ACPI backlight handling is done on
> certain machines, and while this kind of thing really shouldn't be
> done outside the merge window, I ended up pulling it anyway. But I'd
> *really* like to have people test this thing particularly on laptops
> with intel-based graphics. It should only matter (and hopefully
> improve things) for the newer ones with BIOSes designed for Windows 8,
> but hey, the more testing, the better. Backlight handling has beenin
> painful before, so I'm mentioning this explicitly.
8c5bd7a "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects
Windows 8" breaks backlight control for me because
/sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 disappears, and
/sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight doesn't seem to have any effect.
Note that acpi_video0 only worked because I was applying "[PATCH]
drm/i915: quirk no PCH_PWM_ENABLE for Dell XPS13 backlight" [1], so
strictly speaking mainline already didn't work.
Cheers
James
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/19/748
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists