linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/72] 3.10.2-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130721155031.GJ16598@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:50:31 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [ 00/72] 3.10.2-stable review

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:56:39AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:25:17PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.2 release.
> > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:25:08 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.2-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> As I saw a number of ARM fixes, I gave it a try on an Armada XP-GP
> board. I observed no regression compared to 3.10.0. However I still
> need to apply the following patch otherwise it hangs during the boot
> process :
> 
>    faefd550c4 ARM: 7722/1: zImage: Convert 32bits memory size and address from ATAG to 64bits DTB
> 
> So Gregory, Russell, does this patch qualify for stable, and if so,
> could it be proposed in a later version ?

Thanks for testing and letting me know.  I have no objection to adding
the above patch to the 3.10-stable releases, if the others agree.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/