linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iio: mxs-lradc: add scale attribute to channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:22:07 +0200
From:	Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>
To:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
CC:	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com" 
	<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
	"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
	"fabio.estevam@...escale.com" <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iio: mxs-lradc: add scale attribute to channels

Hi Marek,

On 07/19/2013 06:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Hector Palacios,
>
>> Dear Marek,
>>
>> On 07/19/2013 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> @@ -228,39 +230,12 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
>>>>
>>>>    #define LRADC_RESOLUTION			12
>>>>    #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK		((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION) - 1)
>>>>
>>>> -/*
>>>> - * Raw I/O operations
>>>> - */
>>>> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>>>> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>>>>
>>>>    			const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
>>>>    			int *val, int *val2, long m)
>>>>
>>>>    {
>>>>
>>>>    	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>>>>    	int ret;
>>>>
>>>> -	unsigned long mask;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>> -
>>>> -	/* Check for invalid channel */
>>>> -	if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> This was already resolved, so this patch won't apply I'm afraid.
>>
>> You mean the 'unsigned long mask', right?  Yeah, I think I had resolved
>> that one before submitting, but looks like I didn't.
>> The other check is not resolved afaik. We agreed to remove it, but on a
>> different patch.
>
> I mean the other check, yeah. A patch removing that should be applied already.

Where exactly? It's not fixed in Jonathan's fixes-togreg branch, at least.
Did you fixed it?

Best regards,
--
Hector Palacios
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/