[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201307220958.33433.marex@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:58:33 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>
Cc: "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"fabio.estevam@...escale.com" <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iio: mxs-lradc: add scale attribute to channels
Hi Hector,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 07/22/2013 09:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Hector Palacios,
> >
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On 07/19/2013 06:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Dear Hector Palacios,
> >>>
> >>>> Dear Marek,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/19/2013 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>> @@ -228,39 +230,12 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> #define LRADC_RESOLUTION 12
> >>>>>> #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK ((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION)
> >
> > - 1)
> >
> >>>>>> -/*
> >>>>>> - * Raw I/O operations
> >>>>>> - */
> >>>>>> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>>>>> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> >>>>>> int *val, int *val2, long m)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> >>>>>> int ret;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - unsigned long mask;
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> - if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >>>>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> - /* Check for invalid channel */
> >>>>>> - if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> >>>>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This was already resolved, so this patch won't apply I'm afraid.
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean the 'unsigned long mask', right? Yeah, I think I had
> >>>> resolved that one before submitting, but looks like I didn't.
> >>>> The other check is not resolved afaik. We agreed to remove it, but on
> >>>> a different patch.
> >>>
> >>> I mean the other check, yeah. A patch removing that should be applied
> >>> already.
> >>
> >> Where exactly? It's not fixed in Jonathan's fixes-togreg branch, at
> >> least. Did you fixed it?
> >
> > I use linux-next [1], should be it.
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
> > next.git/log/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
>
> That is removing the unsigned long mask, but not the check for invalid
> channel. I'm taking care of the unsigned long mask but an additional patch
> is needed to remove the check for invalid channel.
Sorry for the confusion.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists