[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mpH9XHL2PZK47Lb9frf9hFNQ8sjF2_0p7VJnY8XWhiGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:13:25 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: change defconfig to stop spawning xterm
[Corrected Lennart's email ID]
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> CC'ing Lennart.
>
> Am 22.07.2013 11:45, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>>> [1]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-July/012152.html
>>
>> ... and the patches were rejected. Lennart says that UML providing
>> /dev/tty* is wrong, and that UML should call them /dev/hvc* (or
>> something). Can we do something about the situation? Can we remove
>> /dev/tty*, and provide /dev/hvc*? Will we be breaking existing users?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> UML shouldn't be penalized for not implementing some terminal emulation,
>>> but it should be penalized for doing so under the label of "VT support",
>>> which it simply is not providing.
>>>
>>> They can call their ttys any way they want. If the call them
>>> /dev/tty[1..64] however, then they need to implement the VC
>>> interfaces. All of them.
>
> Lennart, can you please explain us why /dev/tty[1..64] is forced to
> have virtual console support?
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists