[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130722134107.GB26801@laptop>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:41:07 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@...flow.co.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] ARM: ux500: Remove '0x's from HREF v60+ DTS file
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Mark Jackson wrote:
> On 22/07/13 11:52, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts
> > index 3d580d6..46fd8af 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts
> > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> >
> > soc {
> > i2c@...10000 {
> > - bu21013_tp@...c {
> > + bu21013_tp@5c {
>
> Just a query ... why this one .... ^^^ ...
>
> > reset-gpio = <&gpio4 15 0x4>;
>
> ... and not this one .................................. ^^^ ?
>
> > };
> > };
> >
>
> The same for all the other patches in this series.
>
> If this is by design, it might be worth mentioning why some are
> removed and not others.
I can't explain why there seems to be inconsistencies between node
names and the remaining properties. The best I can do is refer you to
the documentation where you can see that this is the standard:
Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt
and
http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists