lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:25:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency
 from cpu_capacity

On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:

> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
> 
> Currently the topology code computes cpu capacity and stores it in
> the list along with hwid(which is MPIDR) as it parses the CPU nodes
> in the device tree. This is required as it needs to be mapped to the
> logical CPU later.
> 
> Since the CPU device nodes can be retrieved in the logical ordering
> using DT/OF helpers, its possible to store cpu_capacity also in logical
> ordering and avoid storing hwid for each entry.
> 
> This patch removes hwid by making use of of_get_cpu_node.
> 
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>


> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 61 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index c5a5954..28ef27a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -74,12 +74,8 @@ struct cpu_efficiency table_efficiency[] = {
>  	{NULL, },
>  };
>  
> -struct cpu_capacity {
> -	unsigned long hwid;
> -	unsigned long capacity;
> -};
> -
> -struct cpu_capacity *cpu_capacity;
> +unsigned long *__cpu_capacity;
> +#define cpu_capacity(cpu)	__cpu_capacity[cpu]
>  
>  unsigned long middle_capacity = 1;
>  
> @@ -100,15 +96,19 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>  	unsigned long capacity = 0;
>  	int alloc_size, cpu = 0;
>  
> -	alloc_size = nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(struct cpu_capacity);
> -	cpu_capacity = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +	alloc_size = nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(*__cpu_capacity);
> +	__cpu_capacity = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  
> -	while ((cn = of_find_node_by_type(cn, "cpu"))) {
> -		const u32 *rate, *reg;
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		const u32 *rate;
>  		int len;
>  
> -		if (cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
> -			break;
> +		/* too early to use cpu->of_node */
> +		cn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu);
> +		if (!cn) {
> +			pr_err("missing device node for CPU %d\n", cpu);
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  
>  		for (cpu_eff = table_efficiency; cpu_eff->compatible; cpu_eff++)
>  			if (of_device_is_compatible(cn, cpu_eff->compatible))
> @@ -124,12 +124,6 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		reg = of_get_property(cn, "reg", &len);
> -		if (!reg || len != 4) {
> -			pr_err("%s missing reg property\n", cn->full_name);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
>  		capacity = ((be32_to_cpup(rate)) >> 20) * cpu_eff->efficiency;
>  
>  		/* Save min capacity of the system */
> @@ -140,13 +134,9 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>  		if (capacity > max_capacity)
>  			max_capacity = capacity;
>  
> -		cpu_capacity[cpu].capacity = capacity;
> -		cpu_capacity[cpu++].hwid = be32_to_cpup(reg);
> +		cpu_capacity(cpu) = capacity;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (cpu < num_possible_cpus())
> -		cpu_capacity[cpu].hwid = (unsigned long)(-1);
> -
>  	/* If min and max capacities are equals, we bypass the update of the
>  	 * cpu_scale because all CPUs have the same capacity. Otherwise, we
>  	 * compute a middle_capacity factor that will ensure that the capacity
> @@ -154,9 +144,7 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>  	 * SCHED_POWER_SCALE, which is the default value, but with the
>  	 * constraint explained near table_efficiency[].
>  	 */
> -	if (min_capacity == max_capacity)
> -		cpu_capacity[0].hwid = (unsigned long)(-1);
> -	else if (4*max_capacity < (3*(max_capacity + min_capacity)))
> +	if (4*max_capacity < (3*(max_capacity + min_capacity)))
>  		middle_capacity = (min_capacity + max_capacity)
>  				>> (SCHED_POWER_SHIFT+1);
>  	else
> @@ -170,23 +158,12 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>   * boot. The update of all CPUs is in O(n^2) for heteregeneous system but the
>   * function returns directly for SMP system.
>   */
> -void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long hwid)
> +void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	unsigned int idx = 0;
> -
> -	/* look for the cpu's hwid in the cpu capacity table */
> -	for (idx = 0; idx < num_possible_cpus(); idx++) {
> -		if (cpu_capacity[idx].hwid == hwid)
> -			break;
> -
> -		if (cpu_capacity[idx].hwid == -1)
> -			return;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (idx == num_possible_cpus())
> +	if (!cpu_capacity(cpu))
>  		return;
>  
> -	set_power_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity[idx].capacity / middle_capacity);
> +	set_power_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity);
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: update cpu_power %lu\n",
>  		cpu, arch_scale_freq_power(NULL, cpu));
> @@ -194,7 +171,7 @@ void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long hwid)
>  
>  #else
>  static inline void parse_dt_topology(void) {}
> -static inline void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpuid, unsigned int mpidr) {}
> +static inline void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpuid) {}
>  #endif
>  
>   /*
> @@ -281,7 +258,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>  
>  	update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
>  
> -	update_cpu_power(cpuid, mpidr & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK);
> +	update_cpu_power(cpuid);
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: thread %d, cpu %d, socket %d, mpidr %x\n",
>  		cpuid, cpu_topology[cpuid].thread_id,
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists