linux-kernel - Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130722165355.GA18371@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:53:55 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Kiko Piris <kernel@...ispons.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:52:21PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> And both of them have been CC'ed to -stable. So they should be hitting
> the stable tree soon.
> 
> Hmm, that reminds me.. whenever a patch cc'ed to stable hit the mainline,
> the patch signers used to receive an automatic email from Greg. I didn't
> get that for the above two patches.. Did the process change due to the
> recent discussions around -stable tree maintenance?

No, it did not change, I just have 150+ pending patches for the
3.11-stable tree that I have yet to get through, give me a few weeks
please.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/