linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Memory mapped architected timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:08:17 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Memory mapped architected timers

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This patchset adds support for memory mapped architected timers. We
> don't have any other global broadcast timer in our system, so we use the
> mmio timer during low power modes. The first patch changes the register
> accessor to an enum per Thomas' request. The second patch is the binding.
> The next two patches lay some groundwork so that the last patch is simpler.
> The final patch adds support for mmio timers.
> 
> Patches are based on v3.11-rc1.

Be aware that as of v3.11-rc2 this doesn't cleanly apply, as the
__cpuinit removal broke the final patch's context in a couple of places.
It would be nice to get rid of the new cpuinit additions too...

With that cleaned up locally, I've gave this a spin on tc2 and a
Foundation model to test the cp15/system timers, hotplugging CPUs and
running a basic test (`time sleep 5`). That all seems to work.

Unfortunately I have no way of testing the memory-mapped timer support,
but I trust you've tested that locally.

For the series:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Updates since v3:
>  * Rebased onto v3.11-rc1
>  * New patch to use compiler warnings instead of BUILD_BUG_ON()
> 
> Updates since v2:
>  * Rebased onto v3.10-rc1
> 
> Updates since v1:
>  * Assigned counter reading function and commented why for arm64
>  * Updated DT binding to replace frame-id with frame-number and use status
>    property
> 
> 
> Stephen Boyd (5):
>   clocksource: arch_timer: Make register accessors less error-prone
>   Documentation: Add memory mapped ARM architected timer binding
>   clocksource: arch_timer: Pass clock event to set_mode callback
>   clocksource: arch_timer: Push the read/write wrappers deeper
>   clocksource: arch_timer: Add support for memory mapped timers
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt         |  59 ++-
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h                  |  14 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h                |  23 +-
>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c               | 446 +++++++++++++++++----
>  include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h               |  10 +-
>  5 files changed, 455 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/