[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374514943.7608.25.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:42:23 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
aswin@...com, scott.norton@...com, chegu_vinod@...com,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched: Limit idle_balance()
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 23:02 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Json,
>
> With V2 of your patch here are the results for the ebizzy run on
> 3.11-rc1 + patch on a 1 socket, 16 core powerpc machine. Each ebizzy
> run was for 30 seconds.
>
> Number_of_threads %improvement_with_patch
> 4 8.63
> 8 1.29
> 12 9.98
> 16 20.46
>
> Let me know if you want me to profile any of these runs for specific
> statistics.
Hi Preeti,
Other numbers that would be interesting to know are the % improvements
when N = 20. That is when I'm getting the bigger performance boosts on
some of the AIM7 workloads.
Would you like to re-run ebizzy with v2 of my patch except replacing
this line of code:
if (idle_duration / 10 < (sd->avg_idle_balance_cost + cost))
with this line of code:
if (idle_duration / 20 < (sd->avg_idle_balance_cost + cost))
Thanks a lot,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists