linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1882637210201641A747464075FFC6490E5A7562@MX101CL02.corp.emc.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 02:07:37 +0000
From:	"Peng, Tao" <tao.peng@....com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Alexandru Juncu <alexj@...edu.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	"andreas.dilger" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebolle@...cali.nl]
> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 12:07 AM
> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: Alexandru Juncu; Pekka Enberg; andreas.dilger; Peng, Tao; driverdev; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code.
> 
> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 08:46 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Doesn't matter, if there are no users, please just remove it.
> 
> Is that, basically, your approach to staging cleanups?
> 
> I ask because I noticed that "drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/gss/"
> is only built if CONFIG_PTLRPC_GSS is set. But the corresponding Kconfig
> symbol is nowhere to be found.
> 
That's my fault. We certainly _want_ the ptlrpc gss code. I'll get it fixed.

Thanks,
Tao

> Or do you prefer that I poke the people involved in (this case in)
> Lustre before suggesting a drastic cleanup like that?
> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
>