[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51ED78EE.9020903@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:24:46 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brandon Philips <brandon@...p.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: is kexec on Xen domU possible?
On 07/22/2013 10:20 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, in any virtualized environment the hypervisor can do a better job
>>> for things like kdump, simply because it can provide two things that are
>>> otherwise hard to do:
>>>
>>> 1. a known-good system state;
>>> 2. a known-clean kdump image.
>>>
>>> As such, I do encourage the virtualization people to (also) develop
>>> hypervisor-*aware* solutions for these kinds of things.
>>
>> In general I agree but if you could not change hypervisor
>> and/or dom0 (e.g. you are using cloud providers which are
>> stick to old versions of Xen) then you have no choice.
>
> Which tends to be where kexec on panic comes in most cases. Getting
> platform vendors to do something sane tends to be a multi-year political
> effort of dubious worth while just solving the problem locally actually
> gets the problem solved for those who care.
>
It should not be a "one or the other" issue.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists