[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYrXcYvXO=vJ1RxLkv4ou_08M3tS_gffDnwqEtod-68Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:00:07 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 11:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> I guess we need a patch set prepared which adds the "active" state
>> and helper function as the first patch, i.e. this:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137094012703340&w=2
>> Can I have your ACK on this patch?
>
> I've verified combination of
> [PATCH] drivers: pinctrl: add active state to core
> [RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
> on OMAP4 SDP board+UARTs and going to send patches on Monday.
>
> So, Acked/Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> (I can't reply directly to thread - not signed to those lists :))
>
> What is the best branch to base my patches on?
I suggest you coordinate that with Tony. He can take my patch
with your ACK if it helps, but it seems he's already up to
optimizing the pinctrl core :-)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists