[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307222256120.14024@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:00:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip/x86/jumplabel] x86: call out into int3 handler
directly instead of using notifier
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> What is the baseline for this patch?
Hi!
it's x86/jumplabel branch, as a followup to commit
fd4363fff3d96 ("x86: Introduce int3 (breakpoint)-based instruction
patching") sitting there.
This branch however seems to be broken by Ingo's mismerge; this e-mail
from earlier today:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/147
implied that he fixed this ("all is fine"), however x86/jumplabel still
contains just 3/3 of Masami's series, and therefore is broken; 3/3 is not
enough, it needs also
kprobes/x86: Remove an incorrect comment about int3 in NMI/MCE
kprobes/x86: Use text_poke_bp() instead of text_poke_smp*()
included or
kprobes/x86: Remove unused text_poke_smp() and text_poke_smp_batch() functions
dropped to be in consistent state again.
I pinged Ingo about this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/281
but the branch still seems to be in an odd state, containing last patch of
Masami's series.
Thanks in advance for fixing this and applying mi fix as well,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists