[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130723095513.19b9638ab4a19157e9834dcf@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:55:13 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: status of various trees
Hi Grant,
Currently linux-next has the following gpio trees:
gpio-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/merge
gpio git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/next
gpio-lw git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git#for-next
Given commit a0062d4e3a0a ("MAINTAINERS: Remove Grant Likely") in the
devicetree-current tree today, should I remove the first two and rename
the third to be just "gpio"? (And does Linus have an alternative
"current" tree?)
I also have the irqdomain tree:
irqdomain git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git#irqdomain/next
Should I remove that? And is there going to be an alternative?
And for spi, I have:
spi git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/next
spi-mb git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git#for-next
again, should I remove the first and rename the second?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists