[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7=ed3=P7ab9zYB23qnwe8Z-ghRfCEurskpcNW5m86j8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:08:28 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Penner, Miles J" <miles.j.penner@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] x86/PCI: prevent re-allocation of already existing
bridge and ROM resources
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> In hotplug case (especially with Thunderbolt enabled systems) we might need
> to call pcibios_resource_survey_bus() several times for a bus. The function
> ends up calling pci_claim_resource() for each bridge resource that then
> fails claiming that the resource exists already (which it does). Once this
> happens the resource is invalidated thus preventing devices behind the
> bridge to allocate their resources.
>
> To fix this we do what has been done in pcibios_allocate_dev_resources()
> and check 'parent' of the given resource. If it is non-NULL it means that
> the resource has been allocated already and we can skip it. We do the same
> for ROM resources as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
This looks reasonable to me.
However, the use of "r->parent" to determine whether the resource is
already allocated is nothing specific to x86. So I think we might be
missing an opportunity to make this more consistent across
architectures. I looked at other callers of pci_claim_resource() for
bridge and ROM resources, and it looks like we might be able to make
similar changes in:
frv pcibios_allocate_bus_resources()
ia64 pcibios_fixup_resources() (via pcibios_fixup_bridge_resources())
mn10300 pcibios_allocate_bus_resources()
mn10300 pcibios_assign_resources() (ROM)
mn10300 pcibios_fixup_device_resources()
parisc lba_fixup_bus()
I really hate the idea of fixing something for x86 but not for other
arches, so maybe somebody could take a deeper look at this and see if
it would make sense to change the other arches, too.
Bjorn
> ---
> arch/x86/pci/i386.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> index 94919e3..db6b1ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static void pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> r = &dev->resource[idx];
> if (!r->flags)
> continue;
> + if (r->parent) /* Already allocated */
> + continue;
> if (!r->start || pci_claim_resource(dev, idx) < 0) {
> /*
> * Something is wrong with the region.
> @@ -318,6 +320,8 @@ static void pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
> r = &dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE];
> if (!r->flags || !r->start)
> return;
> + if (r->parent) /* Already allocated */
> + return;
>
> if (pci_claim_resource(dev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) < 0) {
> r->end -= r->start;
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists